Search for: "Stevens v. Internal Revenue Service et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2013, 12:08 pm
The case, Halbig et al v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm
The case, Halbig et al v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 9:18 am
See Singer, et al. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Gate Guard Services, L.P, et al., v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm
Native Village of Selawik, et al. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:20 am
The check the San Antonio couple endorsed on March 30 was an Internal Revenue Service refund of sorts -- but not in the traditional sense.The $1.34 million check was the result of a settlement between the Browns and the government in Alan Brown, et al. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:02 am
Reports indicate that Lois Lerner has been dismissed from Freedom Path Inc v Lois Lerner et al. lawsuit. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 6:31 am
Joel Steinger, et al. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:14 pm
Chepurko v. e-biofuels, LLP, et al. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:45 am
Dep’t of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Steven T. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:07 am
The Court took no action Monday on another significant business law case — Textron, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:16 am
The suit, Halbig et al v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
By Steven J. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
STEVEN WYNER et al., Defendants and Respondents. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 6:04 pm
Chou, et al., No. 2019-0816-SG memorandum opinion issued (Del. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 8:50 am
Reports indicate that Lois Lerner has been dismissed from Freedom Path Inc v Lois Lerner et al lawsuit. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
L. 357-398 (2010).Vandenbergh, Michael P., et al. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
GONZALES, Attorney General, et al., Petitioners,v.Angel McClaryRAICH et al.No. 03-1454.Argued Nov. 29, 2004.Decided June 6, 2005. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:44 am
” Philip Wexler, Bethesda, et al., eds., 2 Encyclopedia of Toxicology 96 (2005). [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
